Money Measurement Concept

Accounting records state only those facts about a business firm, which can be expressed in monetary terms. In other words, business events and facts that cannot be expressed in monetary terms, howsoever important they may be, are excluded.


For example, the death of the managing director who was guiding the destiny of the company since its inception, the emergence of a better product at a lower price in the market, the emergence of a new technology and so on (though very significant from the future perspective of business) are ignored.


The operational implication of the Money Measurement Concept is that financial statements do not provide all information about the business.


Going Concern Concept

The Going Concern Concept implies that the firm will continue to operate in the foreseeable future. The operational implication of this assumption is that assets are not shown in Balance Sheet at their realisable market value, which implies liquidation value.


Instead, evaluation of assets is with reference to the value of goods and services they are likely to produce in future years to come.


Cost Concept

Assets/resources owned by the firm are shown at their acquisition cost and not at current market value/current worth.


The rationale for this assumption is that it provides objective and verifiable basis for accounting records. Market valuation of assets in use is not only difficult to be made but also is related to subjectivity. Besides, market values may be constantly subject to change.


Above all, determination of objective and undisputed market price of assets, say of land and buildings, plant and machinery, furniture and so on that are not intended for sale is fairly expensive and time consuming. Further, it is important to note that these long-term assets are acquired to be used in business and not for resale.


Clearly, Cost concept is a logical fall-out of Going Concern concept in which current market value of assets does not hold relevance.


Evidently, individual assets (except cash and bank balances) shown in Balance Sheet do not reflect their current market value. Some assets such as land and buildings in major cities may have higher valuation than shown in books and some other assets, like plant and machinery may have lower valuation than shown in records.

Conservative Concept

As the name suggests, Conservative Concept warrants use of conservatism in business records. In relation to Income Statement, the principle is, "anticipate no profits unless realised but provide for all probable future losses". Stock of finished goods is valued at the cost of the market price whichever is lower.


Likewise, it is normal for the firms to provide for likely irrecoverable sum from debtors by creating provisions for bad and doubtful debts at the end of accounting year. This assumption safeguards over-estimation of profits.

Accounting Period Concept

Accounting Period Concept requires that Income Statement should be prepared at periodic intervals for purposes such as performance evaluation and determination of taxes. Conventionally, the time span covered is one year. Corporate firms, as per Companies Act, are required to produce interim accounts and many business firms produce monthly or quarterly accounts for internal purposes. Very often, the accounting period chosen is 1^st April to 31^st March to conform to the financial year of Government. Other accounting periods adopted may be calendar year (January 1 - December 31), Diwali year, Dussehra year and so on.

Accrual Concept

Accrual Concept is a fall-out of Accounting Period concept. This concept requires that expenses incurred for a particular accounting period should be reckoned in the same period, irrespective of the fact whether these expenses have been paid in cash or not in that year. The same holds true for revenues, i.e., revenues earned in a specific accounting period are construed as incomes of the same period, irrespective of their receipts.


This concept is very important to compute true income of a business firm for each accounting period. Let us illustrate. Suppose, a business firm has salary bill of Rs 50 lakh per month. Due to the cash shortage, even though employees worked, the firm could not pay salary for two months. The salary paid is for 10 months only (Rs 50 lakh × 10 months = Rs 500 lakh). In the following accounting year, the firm will be required to pay salaries for 14 months (including salary arrears of 2 months of the preceding year) that is, Rs 50 lakh × 14 months = Rs 700 lakh. The question we are to address is, how much should be considered as salary expenses in both these years. Should it be on the basis of cash payment? If it is so, salary expenses in previous year is to be reckoned as Rs 500 lakh and in the current year Rs 700 lakh. Or, should it be on accrual basis? In the latter situation, it will be Rs 600 lakh in each of these two years.


Evidently, cash basis of expenses recognition has an inherent drawback of manoeuvring and distorting income results of the accounting periods. Under this approach, other things being equal, profit of the previous year will be higher (by Rs 200 lakh) as compared to the current year. Obviously this misrepresents income/profit figures of both these years. Due to this, wrong inferences are drawn about the better performance in the previous year compared to the current year, which is not true. The correct approach obviously is to treat salary expenses of Rs 600 lakh in both the years.


In the absence of Accrual accounting, the Income Statement may indicate more profit in one year at the cost of the profits of some other year, which is entirely inappropriate and illogical. In other words, cash basis of expense recognition will hamper comparison of profit figures over the years. Clearly, there is a very strong case for a business firm to adopt accrual basis of accounting, known as Accrual accounting to determine correct profits.


From the foregoing, it is apparent that deferring expenses, such as salary, cannot increase profits. Likewise, profits cannot be lowered by advance payment of expenses such as, rent and insurance. For instance, insurance payment of Rs 12 lakh as on January 1, for one full year is to be pro-rated. Assuming the firm has the accounting period from April-March, insurance expenses of Rs 3 lakh only (January-March) will form part of income statement of the current year and the balance sum of Rs 9 lakh will be reckoned as expenses of the following year.


What holds true for expenses, the same holds true for revenues. Revenues are recognised at the time of sales and not at the time of receipts from debtors. In operational terms, cash surplus and deficiency are not indicative of profit and loss situations respectively.

Matching Principle

The Matching concept is, in a way, an extension of Accrual concept. In fact, this is the most comprehensive Accounting Principle that enumerates normative framework of income determination of an accounting period of a business firm.


In simple words, this principle requires matching of expenses/costs incurred to revenues realised in an accounting period. The more perfect this matching is, more correct is the income determination.


As per this principle, revenues as well as expenses are to be estimated for an accounting period. As far as estimation of revenues is concerned, it is, by and large, a relatively simple task. Revenues are equivalent to value of goods and services sold during the specified accounting period, irrespective of actual receipt of cash.


However, cost estimation is a relatively difficult task. The example of Royal Industries was very simple in this regard. In practice, there are many expenditures, which benefit several accounting years. Therefore, these expenses cannot be charged to Income Statement of a single year. For this purpose, it is useful to classify expenses into capital and revenue categories.


Capital expenditures (for instance purchase of plant and machinery) involve relatively large investment sum and often have some sales value. Obviously, the purchase cost of plant and machinery (say of 500 lakh) cannot be considered as an expense of a single accounting year in which it is purchased; its cost needs to be spread-over (technically known as depreciation), on some scientific basis, among all the years in which this machine is used. In practice, however, there will be subjectivity involved on the amount of depreciation to be charged every year.


In contrast, revenue expenses, such as rent, salaries, stationary, repairs, etc., benefit one accounting year only and, hence fully charged/written off against the revenues of the same year. They require relatively small sums and do not have sales value. At the best, adjustment for advance/arrears may be needed (already explained under Accrual concept). This adjustment is simple arithmetic exercises and does not involve subjectivity. Thus, for revenue expenses items, the Matching principle is easy to follow.


However, even in the revenue category, there are certain expenses, which are essentially revenue in nature (in the sense that they do not have sales value) but the benefits from them extend to more than one accounting year. For instance, massive advertisement expenditure incurred in launching a new product needs to be shared by the subsequent year(s) also, as it promotes sales of these years and hence augments revenues of these years. Evidently, it is very difficult to apportion with precision the share of advertisement expenditure to be charged in Income Statements of the affected accounting periods. Other notable examples are flotation costs incurred while raising funds through issue of shares/debentures, and Research and Development expenditures. The firms, in practice, are expected to evolve some scientific criterion to apportion these expense items over the years. Howsoever-tall claims may be made about objectivity in this regard, arbitrariness and subjectivity cannot be done away with. It remains in the system.


Above all, there are certain loss items (say loss by fire in godown when goods are not insured and theft of cash/goods), which neither contributes towards generation of revenues of the current period nor of future revenues. They are to be written off in the same accounting year in which they occur, as per convention.


To summarise, Matching Principle clearly brings to fore the problems encountered by business firms in its income determination. A logical corollary of this follows that income determination of a business firm is more an estimate than the actual one.

Consistency Principle

Matching principle has underlined the importance of treatment of capital expenditure items in income determination process. It focuses on the equitable methods, which must be used to write off the cost of plant and machinery (and in that way of other long-term assets) so that its cost is fairly allocated as expense, in form of depreciation, to each accounting period throughout its estimated useful life. There are various methods of charging depreciation. The two notables methods are, Straight-Line Method (SLM) and Written Down Value Method (WDV).


The assumption underlying the SLM is that depreciation is basically a function of time. Accordingly, the cost of depreciation is allocated equally to each year of the estimated useful life of plant and machinery. The sum of depreciation is obtained by dividing the depreciable cost of machine (Purchase price of machine - Estimated Salvage Value) by the number of estimated economic useful life (in years).


In contrast, according to the WDV method, a fixed rate (say 25%) is applied to the cost of the machine (disregarding salvage value) of the first year to determine depreciation charge. In each subsequent period, the depreciation expense is determined with reference to the same fixed rate (25 %) to the written down balance (cost of machine less depreciation in the first year). Obviously, both the methods will provide different answers towards depreciation charges.


The Consistency Principle requires that there should be a consistency of accounting treatment of items (say depreciation method used in respect of plant and machinery) in all the accounting periods. For instance, if Straight Line method of depreciation is used for plant and machinery, the same should be used year after year. Switching over to Diminishing Balance method in any of the subsequent years will obviously affect depreciation charges and, hence, their profits. As a result, the profit picture will not be comparable over the years and, therefore, the justification and relevance of consistency principle.


Likewise, there are different methods for valuation of inventory such as, Last-in-First-Out, First-in-First-Out, Weighted Average Cost Method and so on. In order to maintain uniformity and reveal true and fair view of the performance of business firm, the accounting policies should be followed on a consistent basis. In case, there is a necessity to change, the impact of such a change should be clearly mentioned.


From the foregoing discussion, it is apparent that accounting principles/concepts/conventions have a marked bearing on preparation of both, the Income Statement and the Balance Sheet.